Fund Manager
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE
Contact Us

Re: Yahoo UK - still problems

[ Q2 00 - Q2 01 Archive ] [ Current Message Board ] [ Archives ] [ Search ]

Posted by Mark on October 07, 2000 at 10:21:20:

In Reply to: Re: Yahoo UK - still problems posted by Michael Burgess on October 06, 2000 at 15:54:06:

: : : Mark

: : : Firstly, thanks for the updated retrieve module. Unfortunately, there still seem to be problem with some shares on Yahoo UK. Having updated all the symbols to include the suffix ".L" there are still a number of shares that won't update. Examples are Border TV - BTV.L, Domino Printing - DNO.L, Haynes Publishing - HYNS.L, and Hunting - HTG.L etc.

: : : As Yahoo seem to be congenitally unable to resist changing their suffixes every few months I wonder whether it would be possible to amend Fund Manager to make alterations slightly easier. As you can imagine it is extremely tedious to have to go through 200 - 300 symbols updating the suffix to suit Yahoo's latest whim only to find they are then incompatible with other sources of data such as Market Eye.

: : : One solution that would make things a lot easier would be an option on, say, the Internet Settings dialog to set a global suffix to be used at any given time. To be really useful it would need to work with both the Quote Servers such as Yahoo and any imported data.

: : : In the meantime I would be grateful if you could have another look at the current module to see if there is any reason why the above shares are unwilling to update.

: : : Many thanks

: : : Michael

: : : Email address omitted to avoid spam.

: : Hi Michael,
: : Thanks for the feedback. I agree and understand about having some option
: : to globally affect the suffix of your symbol. I did take a look at the
: : first two of your sample symbols that weren't updating for you. They both
: : updated when I just tried. The BTV.L updated for the 9/14 date, as that
: : is the date being reported by Yahoo-UK. The DNO.L updated correctly though
: : with the price for 10/4. Are you still having problems with these? Can you
: : double check that you don't have a space or something else recorded in the
: : symbol.

: : Thanks,
: : Mark
: : --

:
: Mark

: Many thanks for the response and the explanation.

: I have to admit that I hadn’t appreciated that the shares were being updated but with date the share last traded rather than the current date. I presume that this is a consequence of the revised layout used by Yahoo.

: As a result if a share last traded on, say, 4 October then no price would be picked up on the 5 October for that share. What in fact would happen is that the price for 4 October would be imported again but with zero volumes overwriting the previously recorded figures.

: Although I am not sure there is necessarily a right and wrong way of recording the data this does seem to be a departure from the way it was previously handled by FM and is certainly different from the way other providers such as Market Eye present their data. In the case of Market Eye the closing price on 4 October (in the above example) would be used again as the closing price for 5 October but with zero volumes. The price and volume data for the 4 October would be left unchanged.

: Assuming my assessment is right I wondered if there was any way of reverting to the previous system, which I believe, would be less confusing.

: Other than that I have to say the update process is much quicker.

: Many thanks

: Michael

Hi Michael,
In general if a server provides a date for a quote, FM will use that.
Some servers provide dates with the quotes, and some don't. Yahoo-UK does
provide the date with the quote, so it seems best to update the price for
the specified date. If for example you retrieve prices before the opening
of the market on 10/5, then the prices would be updated for the date specified
by the server, 10/4. This would be the benefit of using the server provided
date. In the case of quote servers that don't provide a date with the quote,
we use the "default" date, which you can control, although through a registry
entry. By default, the default date is the current date. It would be a
pretty easy option to add the ability to use the default date for any quote
server, rather than the date specified by the server. This is something
we can consider for 5.0.

I guess the case in question is when the stock doesn't trade
every day. In this case it still seems valid to only update the price for
the last trade date?? If it hasn't traded in a few days, is its price today
really the same as it was a few days ago?

Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark Beiley

Fund Manager for Windows 3.1x/95/98/NT




Replies:



FundManagerSoftware.com | Search | Site Map | About Us | Privacy Policy