Re: Year2k

[ Q1-Q3 99 Archive ] [ Current Message Board ] [ Archives ] [ Search ]

In Reply to: Year2k posted by Ted on March 18, 1999 at 23:09:24:

: I'm running FM version 8.4 (yeah, I know it's old).
: Are there any Year2k compliance issues I should be
: aware of?

: Ted

Ted,
FM 8.4 was not fully tested for Y2K, but in
general the database is Y2K compliant, because
all of the year data is recorded as 4 digit years
internally. There may be some issues with
the data being displayed properly, such as graph
labels showing up as '100 instead of '00.
The latest versions (10.2 and 3.4) are Y2K
compliant. The upgrade fee is $5, and they are
backward compatible, so can read your 8.4 data...

Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark Beiley

Fund Manager for Windows 3.1x/95/98/NT

Replies: