Mark,
I come back to this request. I still need to compare easily the correlation of two or more investments (peaks and valleys), each with its own full Y-scale amplitude.
Some ideas/suggestions made before in this discussion were:
1) Add the possibility to open a second investment in the same graph area, with a second Y-Axis.
> This seems really too complicated to implement.
2) Add a mode to the Investment Overlay graph such that all plotted lines were not on the same % scale (see the quote in the previous post for the entire description)
> Could be really interesting indeed.
In the beginning of this discussion, you also wrote:
As a work-around, one option you have now is to create 2 graph windows. You can tile the two windows, so they are above/below. Graph one investment in 1 window, and the other in the other window.
This work-around with several graph windows is really not handy on a daily basis, when comparing graphs is part of your daily routine. But the idea is probably here...
I realize my needs would be fulfilled with the requests made
in this post. In particular:
- A 2-display for graphs, with one graph on top of the other.
- An option to change the display order: top to bottom first, and then left to right.
With the option to change the display order, I could sort (manually or not) the investments I want to compare, to display them in the vertically order I want. And I could scroll vertically to change the selection to compare.
With several display choices, I could choose to display vertically, 2 or 3 investments to compare. If the new displays I suggested could be added, there could be also 1, 2, or 3 columns (of 2 or 3 investments each, vertically displayed) that I could compare. And I could easily change the investment order to change a group of investments to compare.
That would be a very efficient setup for comparing investments and their correlation!
So with these improvements I could compare easily the investments with each other (correlation, peaks and valleys), in a very satisfactory manner.
Thanks much for considering.